USPTO serial 75265399
PEPTIMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEPTIMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J TWOMEY
TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR TESTA HURWITZ & THIBEAULT LLPHIGH ST TWR125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | peptide-based immune system response modifiers in prescription pharmaceutical compositions for the modulation of immune or autoimmune responses in the prophylaxis or treatment of conditions in the nature of insulin dependent, juvenile-onset diabetes, multiple sclerosis, pemphigus vulgaris, Grave's disease, myasthenia gravis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, asthma, pathogenic infections, cancer, and allogeneic tissue graft rejection | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |