USPTO serial 75265495
WINSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS E. WHITE
DOUGLAS E WHITE14 CAMINO SOBRANTEORINDA, CA 94563UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | health products, vitamins and powdered nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |