USPTO serial 75265765
PULSEPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PULSEPOINT COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE THIER
STEPHANIE THIER SENIOR TRADEMARK COUNSELUNISYS CORPORATIONTOWNSHIP LINE AND UNION MEETING RDSBLUE BELL, PA 19424Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software systems for managing voice, e-mail and fax messages; enhanced telecommunications services applications software, namely, voice mail applications software, voice messaging applications software, multimedia messaging applications software, E-mail messaging applications software, fax messaging applications software, video messaging applications software, call processing applications software, call routing applications software, auto attendant applications software, and audiotex applications software; software for developing voice mail applications software and magnetically encoded pre-paid calling cards | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, voice messaging services, E-mail messaging services, fax messaging services, video messaging services, multimedia messaging service, call routing services, call processing services, auto attendant services, audiotex services, voice mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | voice mail applications software development services, namely, software design for others and updating of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL BANK
- Other trademarks owned by Digital Sound Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by IMPERIAL BANK
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PULSEPOINT COMMUNICATIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |