USPTO serial 75265852
IRA - INDEPENDENT REFERRING AGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRA - INDEPENDENT REFERRING AGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WAYNE CALDWELL
WAYNE CALDWELL ALEXANDER ANOLIK PC2107 VAN NESS AVE # 200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94109-2536UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | provision of travel booking services to the public | ACTIVE | Aug 27, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALEXANDER ANOLIK, A Professional Law Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by ALEXANDER ANOLIK, A Professional Law Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named IRA - INDEPENDENT REFERRING AGENT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |