USPTO serial 75266282
WK WRIGHT-K TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2261924Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 1999
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WK WRIGHT-K TECHNOLOGY, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY MICHAEL LEVINE
BARRY MICHAEL LEVINE BRAUN KENDRICK FINKBEINER PLC101 N WASHINGTON AVE STE 812SAGINAW, MI 48607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and machine tools, namely, boring machines, drilling machines, tapping machines, reaming machines, metalworking machinery, gear-cutting machines, grinding machines, polishing machines, buffing machines, honing machines, lapping machines, gear-tooth grinding machines, lathes, turning machines, numerically and non-numerically controlled machines, milling machines, machining centers, multifunction numerically controlled machines, station-type machines, metal cutting machine tools, station type tooling, machining centers, broaching machines, sawing machines, cut-off machines, spark erosion machines, ultrasonic machines, electrolytic machines, rifling machines, centering machines, key seating machines, pointing machines, chamfering machines, facing machines, shaving machines, grooving machines, counter-sinking machines, burring machines, deburring machines, indexing machines, dial machines, reaming machines, screw machines, nut slotting machines, threading machines, planers, shapers, rotary transfer machines, in-line transfer synchronous machines, in-line transfer nonsynchronous machines, draw benches, wire rope and wire cable making machines, artificial and natural bonded abrasives machines, coil handling equipment, machines for weaving and other wire fabricating and wire drawing machines, assembly machines, special dies and tools, die sets, jigs and fixtures for all machines, gear shaper cutters and gear shaving cutters, high speed steel milling cutters, chasers, single edge thread-cutting, circular blade and tangent type holders, die heads, tap bodies, work holding devices, namely, rotary tables, indexing work holders, collets, jaws, vises, mandrels, feeding fingers, clamps, stops, punching and shearing machines, bending and forming machines, forging machines, metalworking presses, arc welding machines, resistance welders, plastic work injecting machines, special test, lean machining cells, leak test, function test, laser machine, friction weld machines, bonder cells, material handling and automatic loaders/unloaders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1983 |
| 008 | Hand tools in the nature of work holding devices, namely, vises and clamps for metal removal, assembly, leak testing, destructive and non-destructive testing, welding and grinding, hand tools, indexing work holders, collets, jaws, vises, mandrels, feeding fingers, clamps and stops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1983 |
| 009 | Special Testing Machine for use to Test for Leaks, Pressure, Vacuum, Electrical Continuity; Laser Machines for Welding, Drilling, Stitching and Cutting | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 20, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright-K Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright-K Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wright-K Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WK WRIGHT-K TECHNOLOGY, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |