USPTO serial 75266341
COOL CHUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOL CHUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Franklin Park, IL
Franklin Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Salai
STEPHEN B SALAI HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP700 MIDTOWN TWRROCHESTER, NY 14604-2006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products, namely, milk, flavored milk, buttermilk, chocolate milk, egg nog, yogurt, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute, and milk-based beverages containing coffee, fruit juice, fruit base, or yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | ice tea, coffee-based beverage containing milk | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | fruit juices, fruit drinks, and fruit punch | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |