USPTO serial 75266470
BUDGET SUITES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2268081Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 1999
- Examiner
- PRESSEY, MONTIA GIVENS
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUDGET SUITES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Franklin E. Gibbs
Franklin E. Gibbs Bigelow Companies4640 S. Eastern Ave.Las Vegas, NV 89119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | motel-suites/lodging accommodations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 22, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Budget Suites, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BIGELOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BIGELOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BIGELOW MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BUDGET SUITES, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 25, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |