USPTO serial 75266571
MERESPEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MERESPEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN D MURPHY
STEPHEN D MURPHY SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals, namely, catalysts and absorbents used for purification of chemical feedstocks and industrial liquids, vapors and gases; catalysts; chemical absorbents; chemicals to assist in the purification of natural gas, industrial oils and petrochemicals | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | chemical processing of liquids, gases, natural gas, industrial oils and petrochemicals; industrial treatment of gases, liquids, natural gas, industrial oils and petrochemicals in the presence of catalysts and/or absorbents; services, namely, chemical treatment or processing for the industrial purification of gases, liquids, natural gas, industrial oils and petrochemicals | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | chemical consulting, namely, advice and provision of technical information relating to the purification of gases, liquids, natural gas, industrial oils, petrochemicals and catalysts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |