Drawing for BALTON

USPTO serial 75266854

BALTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY, SUSAN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BALTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOEL E BAIR

JOEL E BAIR RADER FISHMAN GRAUER & MCGARRY PLLC171 MONROE AVE NW STE 600GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal garment rails for installation in closets; metal hat stands; metal wire baskets; metal wire hooks; metal construction components, namely, wire panels and wire support railsACTIVE—
020metal shelving components, namely, wall rails, upright posts, and shelves; wire shelves; metal clothes hangers; metal furniture supports; furniture, namely, tables, desks, desktops, chairs, and shelves; coat hangers; coat stands; and racks for storage, display and filing of all types of goodsACTIVE—
021wire paper towel holders, wire bottle and glass holders, flower pot pedestals, non-metal wastebasketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 2, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 2, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 20, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance