USPTO serial 75267746
COMPLY RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMPLY RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLARK R COWLEY
3500 CITY CTR TWR II301 COMMERCEFT WORTH, TX 76102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing health information to pharmacies regarding patient prescriptions that are not in compliance and providing health information to patients regarding the need for and availability of prescription refills | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2000 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |