USPTO serial 75268202
VIDEO DEPOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEO DEPOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F MICHAEL SAJOVEC
BELL SELTZER PARK & GIBSON PAP O BOX 31107RALEIGH, NC 27622Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | on-line retail and on-line mail order catalog services featuring video cassettes, laser discs, video games and CD-ROMs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |