USPTO serial 75268280
THE ENERGY ADVANTAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ENERGY ADVANTAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE D BRADLEY
LAWRENCE D BRADLEY SHERBURNE POWERS & NEEDHAM PC1 BEACON STBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | repair and maintenance of commercial and industrial energy systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | utility services, namely, transmission and distribution of energy in the nature of electricity, natural gas and liquified petroleum to commercial and industrial end consumers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting in the field of energy services offered to commercial and industrial consumers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |