USPTO serial 75269033
AIR LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AIR LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA PAQUET
PATRICIA PAQUET LIDDELL SAPP ZIVLEY HILL & LABOON, LLP600 TRAVIS STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-3095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Air distribution devices and handling equipment for laboratories, namely, air flow measuring devices which measure air velocity and pressure | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | Air distribution and handling equipment for laboratories, namely, fume ventilation hoods, local fume exhaust vents, and air distribution devices, namely, fans, airflow measuring devices, exhaust vents and snorkels and exhaust sinks | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | conducting training classes in maintaining laboratories, clean rooms, and critical spaces | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | consulting in the field of maintenance and cleanliness standards for laboratories, clean rooms, and critical spaces | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Lab Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Lab Concepts, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIR LOGIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |