USPTO serial 75270265
WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WEST CHICAGO, IL
WEST CHICAGO, IL
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
JAPAN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
JAPAN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
KIRIN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA A/T/A KIRIN AGRIBIO COMPANY, LIMITED
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KIRIN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA A/T/A KIRIN AGRIBIO COMPANY, LIMITED
KIRIN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA A/T/A KIRIN AGRIBIO COMPANY, LIMITED
Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KIRIN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA A/T/A KIRIN AGRIBIO COMPANY, LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill Anderfuren
Jill Anderfuren Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP550 West Adams StreetSuite 300Chicago, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | live petunia plants and seed for petunia plants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BALL HORTICULTURAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by BALL HORTICULTURAL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN BEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by JAPAN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by JAPAN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA A/T/A KIRIN AGRIBIO COMPANY, LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by KIRIN AGRIBIO KABUSHIKI KAISHA A/T/A KIRIN AGRIBIO COMPANY, LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named WAVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |