USPTO serial 75270267
SUPERDECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERDECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARTH X DEROSA
BARTH X DEROSA STEVENS DAVIS MILLER & MOSHER LLP1400 K ST NW STE 1010WASHINGTON, DC 20005-2477UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | house mark for a full line of water proofing, mildew resisting and ultra violet reflecting chemical compositions for articles of masonry, wood and other building and/or construction surfaces | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1989 |
| 002 | house mark for a full line of interior and exterior shellacs, finishes, stains, varnishes, sealers and primers for use as surface coatings; oils for the preservation of wood; paint sealers; wood preservatives; wood preservatives for fences and other building materials; coatings for use on wood, masonry, stucco, brick, stone, tile, concrete and other surfaces | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1989 |
| 003 | house mark for a full line of stripping and cleaning preparations; wood brighteners; stain removers paint and varnish stripping or removing preparations | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2001 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |