Drawing for VICTORY CRAFT

USPTO serial 75270441

VICTORY CRAFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VICTORY CRAFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D PETER HOCHBERG

THE BAKER BLDG1940 E 6TH ST 6TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016painting sets for painting aircraft models, watercraft models, landcraft models, models of houses, and models of animals, all made from plastic sheetingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 9, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 9, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 1, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 15, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 29, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 28, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 17, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance