USPTO serial 75270612
THE INFORMATION AGE STARTS HERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE INFORMATION AGE STARTS HERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W MULCAHY
MSC 2061 ROBERT W MULCAHYAPPLIED MATERIALS2881 SCOTT BLVDSANTA CLARA, CA 95050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Providing professional services in the nature of assistance of users of Semiconductor Wafer Processing Equipment, and Components, namely, epitaxial reactors, chemical vapor deposition reactors, physical vapor deposition reactors, plasma etchers, ion implanters, chemical mechanical polishers, semiconductor wafer process diagnostic and control equipment, and parts thereof | ACTIVE | Feb 3, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |