USPTO serial 75270813
CITY OPTICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2745428Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2003
- Examiner
- CADY, JAMES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CITY OPTICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, Ontario, M4P 2C6, CA
TORONTO, Ontario, M4P 2C6, CA
TORONTO, Ontario, M4P 2C6, CA
WOODBRIDGE, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARKUS COHEN
MARKUS COHEN MARKUS COHEN LAW OFFICE22 ST CLAIR AVE E STE 1010TORONTO, ON M4T 2S3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services featuring eyeglasses, sunglasses, contact lenses, and other optical products; and computerized online retail services in the field of eyeglasses, sunglasses, contact lenses, and other optical products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CITY OPTICAL HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELPROP AUTHORITY INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CITY OPTICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |