USPTO serial 75271556
NOBODY KNOWS THE STUDENT BODY BETTER THAN WE DO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOBODY KNOWS THE STUDENT BODY BETTER THAN WE DO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT B G HOROWITZ
ROBERT B G HOROWITZ COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing for boys, girls and infants, namely, knitted shirts, sweaters, sweat shirts, sweat pants, sweat jackets, jogging suits, pants, overalls, slacks, shorts, jackets, coats, vests, gloves, mittens, scarves, winter headwear, ear muffs, socks, hosiery, swim suits, beachwear, belts, suspenders, bandannas, pajamas and underwear; clothing for girls, namely, blouses, skirts, skorts, jumpers and dresses; and clothing for boys, namely, neckties | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |