Drawing for VISUALABS TRANSLATING IMAGINATION INTO TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75271603

VISUALABS TRANSLATING IMAGINATION INTO TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VANSTON, KATHY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUALABS TRANSLATING IMAGINATION INTO TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ALEXANDRA J HORNE

ALEXANDRA J HORNE SKJERVEN MORRILL MACPHERSON ET AL25 METRO DR STE 700SAN JOSE, CA 95110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009digital cameras that capture, store and transmit a 3D image; display devices, namely, television and computer displays and monitors; flat panel displays, projection television equipment, namely, front screen video projectors, rear screen video projectors, optically active and passive screens, and studio monitors; computer software that enables the computer to present images with viewable depth; computer hardware; retrofit kits, namely, kits permitting display devices such as projection television equipment or computer monitors to be upgraded for display and viewing of 3D images and permitting the conversion of 2D images into 3D images suitable for display and viewing in 3DACTIVE—
041education services, namely, the provision of training courses for the use and manufacture of 3D image creation, presentation, storage, display and imaging technology and distribution of course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—
042research and development services, namely, in the area of 3D imaging technology; and consultation services, namely consulting on 3D image creation, presentation, storage, display and imaging technologyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 15, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance