Drawing for BEC

USPTO serial 75271774

BEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LORENZO, ROBERT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE D BRADLEY

LAWRENCE D BRADLEY SHERBURNE POWERS & NEEDHAM PC1 BEACON STBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035distributorship services in the field of electric vehicles and electric vehicle parts and accessories, including charging systemsACTIVE—
037installation of property security systems and installation, repair and maintenance of energy systems; installation, maintenance and/or repair of parts and/or accessories for electric vehicles, including charging systems and electric vehicle service stationsACTIVE—
038wired and wireless telecommunication services, namely, providing local and long-distance telephone service and providing video and high-speed connections to a global computer networkACTIVE—
039public utility services in the nature of transmission and distribution of electricity, natural gas and liquified petroleum; distribution of chilled water for air conditioningACTIVE—
042consultation in the field of energy and energy conservation, and environmental matters relating thereto, and monitoring of property security systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 7, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance