Drawing for DC EXPERT

USPTO serial 75272232

DC EXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DC EXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL BIGEL

MITCHELL BIGEL MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC PA111 CORNING RD STE 250P O BOX 37428RALEIGH, NC 27627

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009units for supplying and controlling electrical power, namely, Uninterruptible Power Supply units and parts thereof and features therefor including a microprocessor for monitoring the condition of batteries of the Uninterruptible Power Supply units through a control panel and display monitor on the front of the Uninterruptible Power Supply unitsACTIVEDec 31, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 22, 1999CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Oct 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 1999SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 9, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 13, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 19, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance