Drawing for AC VACCINE TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75272715

AC VACCINE TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AC VACCINE TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LUCILLE P NICHOLS

LUCILLE P NICHOLS DARBY & DARBY PC805 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005pharmaceutical preparations and vaccine for the treatment of cancerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 22, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 10, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 29, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 29, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 16, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance