USPTO serial 75273488
MILLENNIUM HEALTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 17, 2002
- Examiner
- DONNELL, RICHARD
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MILLENNIUM HEALTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANE DUHAIME
DIANE DUHAIME CITYPLACE IDAY BERRY & HOWARDHARTFORD, CT 06103-3499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | health care in the nature of health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and dental programs; and reminder services in the area of upcoming important dates and events and dissemination of health, medical and dental information in conjunction with health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and dental programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |