USPTO serial 75273497
ROSETTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROSETTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER
CYNTHIA CLARKE WEBER SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software for use in bioinformatics and genomics, namely, for use in the processing, analyzing, storing and retrieval of complex biological information with particular reference to the human genome and human proteone | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |