Drawing for MILLENNIUM

USPTO serial 75273906

MILLENNIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John G. Tutunjian

John G. Tutunjian Tutunjian & Bitetto, P.C.425 Broadhollow RoadSuite 302Melville, NY 11747

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014sterling silver hollowware, namely, trays, bowls and non-electric candelabraACTIVE—
016photograph albumsACTIVE—
020picture frames; ornaments made of bone, ivory, plaster, plastic, wax and woodACTIVE—
021resin figurines; ornaments made of china, crystal, glass, porcelain and terracotta; ceramic giftware, namely, non-electric candlesticks, storage jars, sugar bowls, creamers, teapots, salad bowls, napkin holders, salt and pepper shakers; glassware; woodenware, namely, salad bowls, napkin holders, salt and pepper shakers, non-electric candlesticks, storage jars, sugar bowls, creamersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 5, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 2, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 2, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 26, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 30, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 30, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 30, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 8, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 20, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 23, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 29, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 22, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 29, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 25, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 22, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 14, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 16, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 14, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 25, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 25, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 11, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 10, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 8, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 11, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 9, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 22, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 8, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance