USPTO serial 75274329
SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MERCEDES-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
70327 Stuttgart, DE
STUTTGART, DE
DAIMLER-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
70567 Stuttgart, DE
70567 Stuttgart, DE
70567 Stuttgart, DE
BOBLINGEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V.T. Giordano
V.T. Giordano Von Maltitz, Derenberg, Kunin, Janssen & Giordano60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2446NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Sub-compact automobiles featuring colored exterior body panels which can be changed easily, low fuel consumption, ease of parking, and crash protection comparable to larger cars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCEDES-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLER AG
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLER-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by DaimlerChrysler AG
- Other trademarks owned by DaimlerChrysler AG
- Other trademarks owned by SMART GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SMART
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |