Drawing for AUTOBAHN

USPTO serial 75275028

AUTOBAHN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOBAHN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW W WALCH

MATTHEW W WALCH LATHAM & WATKINSSEARS TWR STE 5800233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in the fields of computer systems management, operational systems management, open-enterprise systems management, client/server operations, and system operations tools and utilities; database access, query and reporting, analysis, navigation, implementation, administration, conversion, migration and management; client/server adn remote computing applications; computer software for use in common user interface applications, installation applications and data storage applications; programming and application development; network and systems management applications; development tools and utilities; toolkits, and instructional manuals packaged as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 23, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 16, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance