USPTO serial 75275513
BMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba R2J 3V9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE K WADE
STEPHANIE K WADE ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | furl metering systems comprised of multiplexed electronic registers for reading the metered amount of liquid or gas fuel and subsequently displaying the corresponding volume of fuel from multiple meters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |