USPTO serial 75276053
SARNOFF CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SARNOFF CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM J BURKE
WILLIAM J BURKE SARNOFF CORP201 WASHINGTON RD CN 5300PRINCETON, NJ 08540-5300UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video and data equipment in the nature of testing, receiving, and transmitting equipment, namely, video cameras, transceivers, electronic apparatus for testing video and data signals, video and data equipment, video receivers; video and audio processing systems, namely, video encoders, cable modems, micro-processors, signal processors; integrated circuits; computer software for data, image and signal processing; computer hardware; displays; imagers and detectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EX3M | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EX3D | SOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |