USPTO serial 75276212
PROTEIN RICH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTEIN RICH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK J PATTERSON
MARK J PATTERSON WADDEY & PATTERSONNATIONSBANK PLZ414 UNION ST STE 2020NASHVILLE, TN 37219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | liquid and dry dietary food supplements in the nature of shakes and puddings; and nutritional supplements in the nature of food bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | dried fruit snacks; bouillon soups; cream soups; prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; yogurts; banana chips; fruit chips; potato chips; yucca chips; and dry food mixes, namely, chilies and stews | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | shakes; puddings; teas; hot chocolates; flavored and sweetened gelatin desserts; ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars; porable salad dressings; dry salad dressing mixes; bakery goods, namely, rolls, donuts, cookies, brownies, breads, bread sticks, muffins, biscottis, and crackers; dry processed cereals; granolas; oatmeal; dried pasta; prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta, namely, fettucini alfredo, pasta and chicken, macaroni and cheese, and tomato pasta; pretzels; chocolate chips; corn chips; grain-based chips; tortilla chips; popped popcorn with added spices and coatings; pancake mixes; and dry food mixes, namely, spaghetti, curries, and taco fillings | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | fruit drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutritional Source, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named PROTEIN RICH
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |