USPTO serial 75276875
INTERFIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERFIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R LAKE
JAMES R LAKE RIDOUT & MAYBEE1 QUEEN ST E STE 2400TORONTO, ON M5C 3B1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear, namely, shoe or boot components including a hydrophilic footbed insole, a soft inner bootie providing thermal insulation and moisture control for the foot as well as anatomical support for the ankle and arch, and an outer boot or shoe | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |