USPTO serial 75277213
SOBIESKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOBIESKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
21200 BEAUNE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | vodka, brandy and other liquors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |