USPTO serial 75277301
THE WHOLE WOMAN WORKOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE WHOLE WOMAN WORKOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH SHAW & MCCLAY2500 1 LIBERTY PL1659 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | pre-recorded discs, audio tapes, video tapes and digital video discs featuring health and cosmetic information | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed materials namely newspapers, promotions, advertisements, books, magazines, and brochures, featuring health, cosmetic and educational information in the field of fitness and health related techniques | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aubrey, Lisabeth
- Other trademarks owned by Aubrey, Lisabeth
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named THE WHOLE WOMAN WORKOUT
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |