USPTO serial 75278430
GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CLAUDIA M. WERNER
ELIZABETH PEARCE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC70 PINE ST 6TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10270UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing insurance and financial underwriting services to domestic and foreign markets in the area of property and casualty, specialty workers' compensation, healthcare and automobile insurance | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |