USPTO serial 75279881
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Milton, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH W MEDANSKY
KEITH W MEDANSKY PIPER MARBURY RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE ST STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60601-1293UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | residential mineral wool insulation | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |