Drawing for TRUSTED INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75280239

TRUSTED INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOORHEAD CORA ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRUSTED INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD M KEATING

EDWARD M KEATING DORN MCEACHRAN JAMBOR & KEATING55 E MONROE ST STE 3905CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009industrial process control apparatus and systems, namely, automatic, manual, and computer compatible electronic process controllers; electronic analog process control instrumentation, namely, controllers, control stations, namely, controllers for safely shutting down processes and equipment when operational parameters are exceeded, recorders, namely, sequence of event recorders, and indicators, namely, digital time, signal strength, current and voltage indicators; local and remote control units for controlling computers, and electrical, hydraulic and pneumatic equipment, namely, valves, motors, pumps; data processing systems, namely, computer hardware and software for data processing and process controls, namely, temperature, pressure and power consumption controls; computer software for configuration and calibration of transmitters, namely, for transmission of signals over hard wired networks and manuals for using the software sold together as a unitACTIVE—
037installation, repair and maintenance of fire alarm systems, fire safety systems, gas alarm systems, gas safety systems, emergency shutdown systems and of industrial process control systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 31, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 8, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 7, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance