Drawing for GET A REAL JOB

USPTO serial 75280244

GET A REAL JOB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENZMILLER, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GET A REAL JOB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURA J ZEMAN

LAURA J ZEMAN SNELL & WILMER LLP1 AZ CTR400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-0001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042PROMOTING CARPENTER APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 29, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 26, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Dec 13, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 13, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 17, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 28, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 28, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 6, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 17, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance