Drawing for MAXNET

USPTO serial 75280403

MAXNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAXNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD M KEATING

EDWARD M KEATING DORN MCEACHRAN JAMBOR & KEATING55 E MONROE ST STE 2940CHICAGO, IL 60603-5880UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009industrial process control apparatus and systems, namely, automatic, manual, and computer compatible electronic process controllers; electronic analog process control instrumentation, namely, controllers, control stations, namely, apparatus for safely shutting down processes and equipment when operational parameters are exceeded, recorders, namely, sequence of event recorders, and indicators, namely, digital indicators; local and remote control units for controlling computers, valves and electrical, hydraulic and pneumatic equipment containing microprocessors; data processing systems, namely, computer hardware and software for data processing and process controls, namely, temperature, pressure and power consumption controls; computer software for configuration and calibration of transmitters, namely, for transmission of signals over hard wired networks and manuals for using the software sold together as a unitACTIVEJun 7, 1996
037installation, repair and maintenance of distributed control systems, process management systems and industrial process control systemsACTIVEJun 7, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 11, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 11, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 19, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 17, 1999OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 19, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance