USPTO serial 75280557
PERMACEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 1998
- Examiner
- OWCZARSKI, KAREN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 703 means Section 8 was accepted and a Section 15 incontestability declaration is pending USPTO review. The registration remains active while Section 15 is processed. Monitor TSDR for Section 15 acceptance (often status 702).
Need help with PERMACEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENGLEWOOD, NJ
22547 HAMBURG, DD
D-22547 Hamburg, DE
D-22547 Hamburg, DE
D-22547 Hamburg, DE
ERNST MÜHILBAUER GMBH & CO. KG
DE
D-25870 NORDERFRIEDRICHSKOOG, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES T.J. WEIGELL
CHARLES T.J. WEIGELL FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dental preparations for use by dentists, namely, dental cement | ACTIVE | Mar 20, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FOREMOST DENTAL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by MUHLBAUER TECHNOLOGY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst Muhlbauer KG
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst Muhlbauer KG
- Other trademarks owned by Ernst Muhlbauer KG
- Other trademarks owned by ERNST MÜHILBAUER GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by ERNST MUHLBAUER GMBH & CO, KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PERMACEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Sep 1, 2018 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 1, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 1, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2018 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |