Drawing for WORLDCASH

USPTO serial 75281220

WORLDCASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORLDCASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MONICA L THOMPSON

MONICA L THOMPSON RUDNICK & WOLFEP O BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-4027UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036banking and financial services, namely, currency exchange and advice services; issuing and redemption of travellers cheques; electronic funds transfer; cashing of personal cheques; credit card servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 28, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 28, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 13, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 1998REINREINSTATED—
Jul 7, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 7, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 21, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance