USPTO serial 75281535
CEFORM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CEFORM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DINA KHAIRO
DINA KHAIRO BIOVAIL TECHNOLOGIES LTD3701 CONCORDE PKWYCHANTILLY, VA 20151UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | full line of pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of any disease or illness; a full line of veterinary pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of any disease or illness | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | material treatment of pharmaceutical preparations and veterinary pharmaceutical preparations in the nature of making spherical particles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fuisz Technologies Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Fuisz Technologies Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named CEFORM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |