Drawing for MASTERPIECE

USPTO serial 75281749

MASTERPIECE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERPIECE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH L STRABALA

1 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1020SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019doors constructed of synthetic materialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 30, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 29, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 29, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 15, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 7, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 19, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 1998AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 30, 1998IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance