USPTO serial 75282248
PERSONAL TRAINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERSONAL TRAINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DALE PAUL DIMAGGIO
DALE PAUL DIMAGGIO MALIN HALEY DIMAGGIO & CROSBY PA1936 S ANDREWS AVEFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | boxing and martial arts equipment, namely, heavy bags, striking and speed bags, heavy bag stands, and protective gear, namely, boxing gloves, speed bag gloves, heavy bag gloves, training gloves, punching mits, boxing foot pads, and hand wraps | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |