USPTO serial 75282563
USC UNIVERSAL SECURITY CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENG, MYRON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with USC UNIVERSAL SECURITY CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P JAY HINES
VENDA SECURITY CORPP O BOX 350339PALM COAST, FL 32136UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic systems for processing and storing data in connection with smart card applications, namely, computer software, smart cards, smart card readers, access control terminals, and card connectors for interfacing between a smart card and a host computer | ABANDONED | Jan 3, 1997 |
| 042 | design and development of smart card hardware, software and systems and computer programming and consultation services in connection with smart card applications, such as banking, shopping, health, customs, security, and other on-line and off-line transactions | ABANDONED | Jan 3, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |