USPTO serial 75282589
ASTROVISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ASTROVISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Kadoma-shi, Osaka Prefecture, JP
Other trademarks owned by MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROL L B MATTHEWS
CAROL L B MATTHEWS GADSBY & HANNAH LLP1747 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | large scale video display systems primarily comprised of color cameras, character/graphic generators, VTRs, document cameras, still image readers, data input terminals, monitors and television antennae for use at stadiums, arenas, convention halls, theaters, show rooms, excposition sites, festival grounds, exhibition places, theme parks, race courses, race tracks, amusement parks, fairs, concert halls, multipurpose halls, concourses, atriums, air terminals, public spaces, ground events and other public events and for use on building exteriors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |