USPTO serial 75282612
WEBPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WEBPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Worth, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STANLEY D FERENCE III
STANLEY D FERENCE III FERENCE & ASSOCIATES400 BROAD STPITTSBURGH, PA 15143UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, creating, designing, implementing and updating web sites for others for use in providing adult entertainment on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |