USPTO serial 75282922
COLOUR GRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2452219Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2001
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COLOUR GRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth F. Florek
KENNETH F. FLOREK FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC1156 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10029-2702UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | hand held manual kitchen tools used in the preparation of various foods, namely, ladles, [ mashers, ] turners, slotted spoons, [ whisks, rolling pins, ] and spatulas | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ROBINSON HOME PRODUCTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Robinson Knife Mfg. Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Robinson Knife Mfg. Co., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named COLOUR GRIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 15, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |