USPTO serial 75282935
DIRECT POWER PLUS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT POWER PLUS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOTT M ALTER
SCOTT M ALTER HALE & DORR LLR1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | portable electronic power apparatus and accessories, namely, battery converters/eliminators for wireless phones, wireless plug-in savers/chargers, wireless phone batteries, camcorder batteries, wireless antennas for hand-held and transportable phones, leather cases for wireless phones, PCMCIA cords, wireless phone and video battery chargers/conditioners, and vinyl and leather bags for wireless and transportable phones, and hands-free kits for wireless phones, laptop computers, battery packs and accessories | ABANDONED | Feb 6, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |