Drawing for THE HUNTING GAME

USPTO serial 75283234

THE HUNTING GAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUNN, ELIZABETH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HUNTING GAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT R MALLINCKRODT

ROBERT R MALLINCKRODT MALLINCKRODT & MALLINCKRODT10 EXCHANGE PL STE 510SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multimedia computer games with wildlife, wildlife management, shooting, hunting, hunting safety, and outdoor sport themes, and computer programs feturing information on wildlife, wildlife management, shooting, hunting, hunting safety, and outdoor sportsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 20, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 20, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 14, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 28, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance